The Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement - 983 Words

Progression or Suppression? Evaluating the Theoretical Policies in the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement Liberalism asserts several tenets that explain the United States’ people’s failure to approve of a potential trade agreement, the Trans Pacific Partnership. Classical Liberalism refers to a series of concepts which are contingent upon individual autonomy. The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP) refers to a proposed free trade deal amongst 12 countries across the Asia-Pacific region including the USA. The tenets of liberalism that explain the people’s failure to approve of the possible trade agreement include popular sovereignty and consent, individual autonomy, individual rights and limited and representative government. An essential tenet of liberalism, â€Å"Popular Sovereignty and Consent† is a principal notion when it comes to the American people’s majority dislike of the Trans-Pacific Partnership. This tenet states that the government should be given its authority from the people from which it may govern. The tenet moreover states that the authority ought to rest in the hands of the people and not an elite figure. There is a violation of this tenant of liberalism through a most basic option: through how the Trans-Pacific Partnership was written. The government wrote the entire document in secret. The treaty is also being negotiated with only business interests at the table. â€Å"Groups representing the interests of consumers, labor, human rights, the environment,Show MoreRelatedThe Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement1544 Words   |  7 Pagesthe Trans-Pacific Partnership. This, seven years in the making, the document has now finally showed all its entire document on November 5th , 2015. Where it is now being reviewed by congress for ninety days (DePillis, 2015). However, what exactly is the Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement? Also, how does this affect society? While the last question is too broad to answer; this paper will show the effects on three specific products: milk, dolphins, and video games. The Trans-Pacific Partnership agreementRead MoreThe Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement1918 Words   |  8 Pagestaken by those involved because it is a matter that effects people deeply, and when foreign governments and markets are thrown into the mix as well then the fireworks will begin. The Trans Pacific Partnership agreement is no exception to this, hard lines for and against have formed stronger and stronger as the agreement has shaped, and each side has their reasons why they are right, but both cannot be right simultaneously so the question has to be asked which side is right? The Washington post andRead MoreTrans Pacific Partnership : A Free Trade Ag reement1066 Words   |  5 PagesThe Trans-Pacific Partnership, also known as the TPP is a free trade agreement that is among 12 countries including Canada. This trade agreement is for the 21st century. The deal is between Australia, United States, Brunei, Peru, Singapore, New Zealand, Japan, Mexico, Chile, Malaysia, and Vietnam. According to this, the agreement covers 40% of the world’s economy. The TPP’s effective goals are to improve trade, investment, economic growth, job creation, development, and innovations through the partnershipRead MoreThe Trans Pacific Partnership Free Trade Agreement Essay1612 Words   |  7 Pagesabout 12 Countries in the Pacific region, 8 years of restricted secret meetings, an estimated 28,000,000,000,000(28 trillion dollars) which equals roughly 40% of the worlds Gross Domestic Product(GDP) and Congress can’t make any provisions what so ever. The Trans-Pacific Partnership Free Trade Agreement(TPP) is the largest trade deal to e ver be executed in history. In 2005 4 Countries Brunei, Chile, New Zealand and Singapore Signed the Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership program(TPSEP). In 2008Read MoreKey Provisions Of The Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement1656 Words   |  7 PagesThis paper focuses on the key provisions of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement. The agreement is an expansion from the Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement to now include 12 countries. The U.S. government has specific objectives, 13 in fact, for the agreement. If finalized, the agreement would encompass 40 percent of the world’s economy and produce over $300 billion U.S. dollars a year. Labor, goods, services, textiles, and intellectual property make up some of the key provisionsRead MoreTrans Pacific Partnership : A Free Trade Agreement Essay1719 Words   |  7 PagesThe Trans-Pacific Partnership is something that you may have heard of on the news, but like many, you probably do not know what exactly it is. The Trans-Pacific Partnership or TPP as it is commonly referred to in shorthand is a free trade agreement that the United States and 12 countries which includes Australia, Canada, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru, the United States, Vietnam, Singapore, Brunei, and New Zealand. Free Trade means that tariffs are virtually dismantled in between countries to supposedlyRead MoreThe Trans Pacific Partnership Is A Controversial Free Trade Agreement1214 Words   |  5 PagesThe Trans-Pacific Partnership is a controversial free trade agreement between Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, the United States, and Vietnam, which encompass forty percent of the total global economy, making it the largest trade deal signed in the last twenty years. While President Barack Obama has been pushing this agreement, many politicians have come out against it, including presidential hopefuls Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders, callingRead MoreTh e Trans Pacific Partnership Is An Asia Pacific Regional Free Trade Agreement1146 Words   |  5 Pagesâ€Å"The Trans-Pacific Partnership is an Asia-Pacific regional free trade agreement currently under negotiation between the Unties States and about a dozen countries surrounding the Pacific Ocean† (Weddle, 2013). It’s a giant free trade deal that has been in the process of negotiation for about a decade. The ultimate goal of the deal is to join countries together through a unified agreement and make free trade among these counties smooth and painless. The trade agreement covers everything from tariffsRead MoreTrans Pacific Partnership : A Multilateral Free Trade Agreement1958 Words   |  8 Pagesthe Trans-Pacific Partnership (Greenburg, par. 4). The United States will supposedly lose sovereignty and it will hurt jobs and economy by including China in the Trans-Pacific Partnership. However, the partnership involving China will improve both countries relations and economies tremendously and willcreate many more jobs. Therefore, the United States needs to invite China into the Trans-Pacific Partnership. The Trans-Pacific Partnership, also known as the Trans-Pacific Strategic Partnership AgreementRead MoreA Short Note On Trans Pacific Partnership ( Tpp ) Trade Agreement1423 Words   |  6 PagesPresident, I am writing this letter in regards to the involvement of the U.S. in the current negotiations of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade agreement. I would like to address the current flaws that this partnership presents for the United States and how it will negatively affect not only our economy, but the American people as well. This agreement with eleven other Asia-Pacific countries aims to â€Å"open markets, set high-standard trade rules, and address 21st-century issues in the global economy†

Should College Athletes Be Paid - 886 Words

student athletes, should be designed in a way that promotes academic progress as well as graduation. Whether you are on a college campus or listening to a sports talk radio show, the question of should college athletes be paid seems to have been discussed forever. One of the major arguments for paying student athletes is that the colleges use the athletes to generate revenue for the college. â€Å"There are also those that argue that athletes should be paid for the hours that they often put in their respective sports and classrooms† (Jung, 2013). There have been a lot that has been said in regards to the fact that athletes are making colleges better because they attract other potential students and the athletes should be rewarded for that impact to the college (Smith, 2011). Some may argue that all a student athlete has to do is be patient and their huge professional salary will be there for them in a few years. These same individuals feel it is wrong that the student athletes are not paid for all the work they do. (McCormick, 2006). If the athletes deem themselves as being good enough and do not want to play in the collegiate schools, they should instead jump to a professional league. â€Å"Professional leagues such as the National Basketball Association, National Hockey League, National Football League and Major League Baseball often have some type of an age restriction for the athletes that want to work for the league† (Smith, 2011). These restrictions in most instances do notShow MoreRelatedShould College Athletes Be Paid?1289 Words   |  6 PagesThroughout the years college sports have been about the love of the game, filled with adrenaline moments. However, the following question still remains: Should college athletes get paid to play sports in college? Seemingly, this debate has been endless, yet the questions have gone unanswered. The National Collegiate Athletics Association (NCAA) plays a vital role in this debate. The NCAA is a billion dollar industry, but yet sees that the athlete should get paid for their hard work and dedicationRead MoreShould College Athletes Be Paid?1334 Words   |  6 Pagesrising to the surface is â€Å"Should college athletes be paid?†. This has become a burning question. The NCAA is a multibillion-dollar industry, that makes millions, if not billions, in revenue. Yet it’s still maintains the non-profit status meaning that the industry is not set on making a profit and none of the revenue that is made is distributed to its members, managers, or officers. While most players who play in college sports are under a scholarship, that pays for the college tuition, books, and housingRead MoreShould College Athletes Be Paid?1578 Words   |  7 PagesAshay Mehta Nou Per 8 Should College Athletes Be Paid? One of the hottest debates in the sports industry is if college athletes should be paid. If you want to pay these athletes, how would the college determine the dollar amount that should be paid? Should the basketball team make more than the football team? Should the the soccer team be paid as well? Cheerleading? Chess team? Should everyone on the team get a salary? What if your college is good at football and your basketball team is awfulRead MoreShould College Athletes Be Paid?1398 Words   |  6 Pagesbelieve that college athletes at the highest performing schools are better treated than others. Although they do not get paid, they do receive some benefits for being athletes that other students would not get. One advantage for playing a sport is access to scholarships that some schools reserve for their athletes. Depending on the school and the athlete’s performance, money towards tuition is often given. Only some schools are willing to grant â€Å"full-ride† scholar ships for certain athletes. AccordingRead MoreShould College Athletes Be Paid?1364 Words   |  6 PagesHave you paid attention to all of the news that has been surfacing about collegiate sports lately? It is a big topic now days in the world of sports on weather college athletes should be getting paid to play sports. College athletics have gained great popularity of the past few decades, and have brought schools lots of revenue. A lot of college athletes think they should be getting paid for their services they do for their school. College sports like basketball and football generate over six billionRead MoreShould College Athletes Be Paid?1130 Words   |  5 PagesWhat college athlete would not want to be paid to play the sport that he or she loves? The real question is, though, should college athletes be paid for their roles in a college’s athletics? They are many points to each side of this recent controversial topic, which is why this has been made into such a hot deba te in the past couple of years. As of right now, these athletes are not getting paid, but many of them truly believe that they should. Others believe that they already are being paid throughRead MoreShould College Athletes Be Paid?986 Words   |  4 PagesPaying the College Athlete The college athlete has steadily grown in popularity in the United States over the span of the past decades. Monetarily speaking, this increased publicity has been extremely beneficial for National Athletic Association (NCAA) and all the colleges involved in athletics which has sparked the dispute of whether or not the athlete should be paid for their hard work and dedication on the field and to their school or if the athletic scholarship is more than enough. College athletesRead MoreCollege Athletes Should Not Be Paid1558 Words   |  7 Pagesstudent-athletes participate in a variety of different sports, and currently they do not receive paychecks for their performances. College athletics have attained an extensive popularity increase among Americans over the past few decades. This has resulted into increased revenues for the National Collegiate Athletic Association [NCAA] and the participating colleges, which has fuelled the debate of whether or not college athletes should colle ct an income. College athletes should not be paid to playRead MoreShould College Athletes Be Paid? Essay1739 Words   |  7 PagesShould College Athletes Be Paid to Play? The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) governs all laws regarding college sports under the Division I, Division II, and Division III conferences. Its sole purpose is to protect student-athletes on and off the field, and regulate all games and scholarships affiliated with the students. Right now there are 1,121 colleges and universities under the NCAA (NCAA, n.d.), leaving a chunk of schools out—those who do not participate in Division I, II,Read MoreCollege Athletes Should Be Paid1254 Words   |  6 PagesSome college athletic departments are as wealthy as professional sports teams. The NCAA has an average annual revenue of $10.6 billion dollars. College athletes should be paid because of the amount of revenue that they bring to their college. Each individual college should pay its athletes based on how much revenue they bring to the college in which they attend. The colleges that win their Division title, their Conference title, or the National championship, give bonuses to the Head coach of that

Native America and Astronomy Free Essays

To a great degree, the reading point to an aspect of the study of astronomy that many people might not be entirely familiar. That aspect is, of course, the contributions of the Navajo to the study of astronomy. This contribution has been largely ignored by many in the established scientific community in large part due to the fact that the concept of Navajo astronomy is more based on interrelation of what is discovered as opposed to a categorizing approach that does not integrate the discovered with the discoverer. We will write a custom essay sample on Native America and Astronomy or any similar topic only for you Order Now Consider the following: The concept of a dynamic integrated whole is important in Navajo cosmology and astronomy. The pattern of relationship is far more important than the identification, location and Greek or Arabic name of any individual star. The individual stars contribute to the significance of the whole. (Begay/Maryboy Navajo Astronomy) In other words, there is a concept of harmony and balance present in the concept of Navajo astronomy. The earth, stars, moon, etc are interwoven as parts of a whole known as the universe. In traditional approaches to astronomy, there is an almost centrist position that the earth is the center of the universe and that the moon and stars are dependent upon the earth. While this may sound like an odd ideology of exceptionalism, the reality is that this WAS the exact belief of astronomers at one point in history. Now, this does not mean that the barren moon is on equal parity of the earth, but it does acknowledge that the mere concept of earth centrist ideology can lead to a belief in pillaging the environment because there is limited acknowledgment that the other components of the universe help keep the earth in harmony. This is why it becomes important to read the more extensive work â€Å"Sharing the Skies† because it allows a more in depth look at the subject. Considering the complexity  of the subject, a lengthier work is required in order to develop a much more clear understanding. One of the more interesting aspects of â€Å"Sharing the Skies† is essentially the fact that the work points out that when one realizes that most astronomy is centered on a Western Civilization origin, one realizes that the concepts and definitions of astronomy lead directly to one culture. When one looks at different cultural explanations of astronomy, then an individual can gain an insight into the cultures of other peoples and nations. In Williamson’s â€Å"Native American Astronomy,† the reader discovers a bit more depth to the origins of Native American cosmology. It is important to present and define Native Astronomy in the manner that Williamson presents it because he re-establishes the fact that Native astronomy is a sphere of science and not the weird, New Age quasi-religion that it has become thanks to a number of hack writers who have flooded bookstores with dubious works. â€Å"Application to Astrology† ties much of the philosophy of Native Astronomy and earth studies into the component that conventional sciences ignore: the spiritual component. Again, this stresses the idea of interrelation between various parts of a whole. Since the spiritual can not be removed from the person and the person can not be removed from the earth, then it goes without saying that there is an interrelation between the human spirit and the earth. Both halves of the same idea compliment each other and compliment each other quite effectively. Bibliography Begay, David and Maryboy, Nancy C.Finding the Thunderbird in Navajo Astronomy. Bluff: Indigenous Education Institute, 2004. Begay, David and Maryboy, Nancy C. Sharing the Skies Bluff: Indigenous Education Institute, Date Unknown How to cite Native America and Astronomy, Essay examples

Fdrs Influence As President Essay Example For Students

Fdrs Influence As President Essay Fdrs Influence As PresidentSome have called him the best president yet. Others have even claimed that he was theworlds most influential and successful leader of the twentieth century. Those claims can be backed up by the overwhelming support that he received from his citizens throughout his four terms in office. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt began a new era in American history by ending the Great Depression that the country had fallen into in1929. His social reforms gave people a new perspective on government. Government was not only expected to protect the people from foreign invaders, but to protect againstpoverty and joblessness. Roosevelt had shown his military and diplomatic skill as the Commander in Chief during World War II. This wartime leadership and international relations policy won him an award in the hearts of many Americans. Roosevelt threw his hat in the ring in 1931 in order to prepare for the election of 1932. Democratic Party chairman James A Farley directed his campaign. He started a nationwide radio address, outlining a program to meet the economic problems of the nation. He coined the term forgotten man to mean all of those who had been hard hit by the evils of the depression. These radio addresses were the start to what he called the fireside chats. Overall, Roosevelt was the most energetic and dynamic candidate, and he was nominated by the party on the fourth ballot. Although he displayed excellent characteristics, his competition was fairly tough. He was up against John Nance Garner of Texas (who would be his Vice Presidential running mate);Newton D. Baker of Ohio, who was former Secretary of War; and former Governor Alfred E. Smith of New York. For three ballots, Roosevelt held a large lead, but lacked the two- thirds margin necessary for victory. Farley then promised John Garner the vice presidential nomination, which he accepted grudgingly. Then FDR took the presidential nomination on the fourth ballot. One of the purposes of the national convention is to bring the party together in a movement of support behind the nominated candidate. Although there was rough competition during the choosing process, most party leaders were happy with the Roosevelt choice. It would help pull votes from the urban-Eastern region of the country. Also, Roosevelt made a dashing introduction at the Chicago convention by being the firstnominee to ever write an acceptance speech. In this speech, he brought emotions from the audience in his last line, I pledge to you, I pledge to myself, to a new deal for the American people. During the November campaign against Hoover, Roosevelt suggested a few parts of the so called New Deal. He spoke of relief and public works money. He wanted todevelop a plan to cut agricultural overproduction. He was for public power,conservation and unemployment insurance. The repeal of prohibition and stock exchange regulation were also big items on his platform. However, other than the aforementioned items, Roosevelt was quite vague about other plans. He mentioned little about his plans for industrial recovery or labor laws. As much foreign policy experience as he had, he talked very little of it during the campaign. Many believe that he was simply trying to home in on the problems that the American public saw most prominent at the time. When it came to election day, Roosevelt was the only viable alternative to Hoover, who many blamed for the Great Depression, although critics argue that it was the presidents preceding the Hoover Administration. The outcome reflected this thinking: Roosevelt won 22,821,857 votes compared to Hoovers 15, 761,841. Roosevelt also won the electoral 472 to 59. The voters had sent large majorities of Democrats to both houses as well, which would enable Roosevelt to accomplish more by pushing through more bills. Roosevelts second election was in 1936. The Democratic National Convention re-nominated him by acclamation no vote was even taken. Vice President Garner wasalso nominated. The Republican opponents were Governor Alfred M. Landon ofKansas and Frank Knox, a newspaper publisher. Republicans, seeing Roosevelts overwhelmingpopularity, were reaching for a tomato to throw. They claimed that he had not kept his promise to the people to balance the budget. Roosevelt replied by pointing to theactions of fighting the depression and returning the nation to prosperity to precedence over the budget. As expected, Roosevelt won by a landslide. He received 27,751,491 popular votes and carried 46 states with 523 electoral votes. His opponent only received 16,679,491 popular votes and 2 states with 8 electorals. This reflected the nations confidence in the man and his leadership ability. However, the nation still had a long way to go. He stated in his inauguration address, I see one-third of a nation ill-housed, ill-clad, and ill-nourished. After another over-all successful term, Roosevelt ran again in 1940. The Democratic Party broke precedent with his re-nomination. There were some party members that felt it was unfair to elect him again, so his margins of popularity fell slightly. This time, he was not the only one up for the nomination. There was James Farley, who received 72 13/30 votes, previous Vice President John Nance Garner, receiving 61 votes; Millard Tydings of Maryland, receiving 9 1/2 votes; and Cordell Hull,former Secretary of State, who received only 5 2/3 votes. Secretary of AgricultureHenry A. Wallace was chosen as a Vice Presidential running mate. The Republicans nominatedWendell Wilkie of Indiana, a corporation president, to oppose the Roosevelt/Wallace team. The two candidates had some similar views. Wilkie supported Rooseveltsforeign policy and favored many New Deal programs already in effect. However, Wilkie opposed the controls that the Democratic Administration had put on business. To obtain more Republican support for this campaign, Roosevelt used his executive power of appointment to appoint two republicans to his Cabinet in 1940. The first was Henry L. Stimson for Secretary of War, who held the office under the Taft Administration. He also held the office of Secretary of State under President Hoover. Stimson replaced Harry Woodring who was regarded as isolationist. Rooseveltsprevious opponent who ran for as Vice President on the republican side, newspaper publisher Frank Knox, was placed as the Secretary of the Navy. The Republicans based their campaign on the tradition that no President had ever gone for a third term in succession. To counter this, Roosevelt put the spotlight on his administrations achievements. Because of the risky situation abroad, many felt that Roosevelts expertise was needed if war occurred. The election results were closer this time than the previous two times. Roosevelt received 27,243,466 popular votes and 449 electoral votes. Wilkie received22,334,413 popular votes and 82 electoral votes. When it was time for Roosevelts third term to end, he initially said he wanted to retire. However, he later declared that he felt it was his duty to serve if his country calledon him. Much of this feeling was based on the idea that it would be a bad thing for the country to change leadership in the middle of the war. Many of the presidents advisors felt he would not live through a fourth term, considering his heart disease, hypertension, and other cardiac problems. Because of his condition, the Vice President nomination forthe 1944 election was of utmost importance. Roosevelt was persuaded to drop Henry Wallace, whom many regarded as too liberal and emotionally unsuited to be president. Harry Truman of Missouri was chosen to fill the spot. Although Roosevelt receivedparty nomination on the first ballot, there were two other candidates: Harry Byrd (89 votes) and James Farleyagain (1 vote). The Republicans nominated Thomas Dewey of New York for President and John Bricker of Ohio for Vice President. Again, their argument was term length. No President should serve for 16 years, they declared. The opposing argument by the Democrats was that no country should change horses in mid-stream. Roosevelt drove around the streets of New York City in a rainstorm and then made a speech to show thathis health was not a major issue. The election outcome was even slimmer this time, but Roosevelt still captured a hearty vote. Roosevelt received 25,602,505 votes and 432 electoral votes and his Republican opponent received 22,013,372 popular votes and 99 electoral votes. Many of the advisers who helped Roosevelt during his presidential campaigns continued to aid him after he entered the White House. Below are the four cabinets: FIRST TERM March 4, 1933-January 20, 1937 POSITION NAME/ STATE DATE OFINDUCTION Secretary of State: Cordell Hull, TN 3/4/33 Secretary of Treasury: William Hartman Woodin, NY 3/4/33 Henry Morganthau, Jr. My Best Friend Argumentative Essay The federal government would withdraw from the direct relief, leaving it up to state and local governments. A program of social reforms would also beincluded in the second half of the New Deal. This would include social security for the aged, unemployed and ill, as well as slum clearance and better housing. One of the first acts of the New Deal, Phase II was the Emergency Relief Act. By Executive Order, Roosevelt created three new relief agencies in 1935. The first wouldbe the Work Progress Administration (WPA), which would spend $11 billion on temporaryconstruction jobs. Schools, theaters, museums, airfields, parks and post offices were constructed as a result. This increased the national purchasing power. Another part of the Emergency Relief Act was the Resettlement Administration (RA). Its goals were to improve the condition of farm families not already benefiting from AAA, prevent waste by unprofitable farming operations or improper land use and projects such as flood control and reforestation. This agency also resettled poor families in subsistence homestead communities. These were basic suburbs constructed for the citys poor workers. Many times, these communities were known as greenbelt towns because of their proximity to open space. Two model suburbs were set up Greenbeltin Washington DC and Greenhills in Cincinnati. Another aid to the farmer was the Rural Electrification Administration (REA). Its goals were to provide electricity to isolated areas where private utility companies did not see it profitable to run lines and set up service. The year of 1935 brought with it numerous reform efforts. These were the final efforts of the New Deal before the nation geared up for war. Included in this was the National Labor Relations Act, whose most important function was to set up the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), which monitored corporations to ensure worker rights and safety. The National Housing Act created the US Housing Authority (USHA) to administer low-interest 60-year loans to small communities for slum clearance and construction projects. This agency also gave subsidies to those landlords willing to offer low-income housing. A Revenue Act of 1935 capped off the New Deal with a tax onthe rich, and a tax break on the middle classmen. One of the most important and lasting effects of the Roosevelt Administration was his into push for the Social Security Act of 1935. This was an innovative plan that was supposed to lead to a nation-wide retirement system. It also established a cooperative federal-state welfare system/unemployment system. A tax was levied on theemployee, which was met dollar for dollar by the employer. This tax went into a special fund operated by the Social Security Administration. Later in life, when a person reached retirement, they could draw the money out of this account that they had placedin for the last few decades. The Supreme Court was fairly conservative, and attempted to shoot holes in many of Roosevelts New Deal Programs. It felt that Roosevelt had taken his legislative presidential power to recommend legislation too far, and that Congress was equally responsible for allowing him to usurp the powers for reasons of what Roosevelt claimed was a national emergency. In a statement made in May of 1935, one of the Supreme Court Justices announced that Congress had delegated virtually unfettered powers tothe Administration. something truly inconsistent with the constitutional prerogatives and duties of Congress. The Supreme Court even went as far as to strike the entire AAA program down, claiming that it violated states rights. FDR was infuriated at the actions of the Court. He thought of them as nine old men who were living in days gone by far too conservative to see the economic and social needs of today. He soon began to plan retribution, however in secrecy. Twodays after inviting the Justices to a formal social function at the White House, he called upon his staff to write up the Judicial Reform Act of 1937. Essentially, this document alleged that the Judicial Branch of the federal government was overwhelmed. The Act describeda desperate situation in which reform and recovery issues were not flowing through government on a timely basissimply because the Supreme Court was backed up. His answer to solve the dilemma was to use his executive power of appointment and place more Justices on the Court. Another section of the Act suggested that at age 70 (mostof the Justices were above this age), each Justice would be supplemented with an additionalJustice. This meant up to 15 Supreme Court Justices serving at one time. Roosevelt hoped to load the Court with social liberal Democrats who would not oppose his New Deal Programs. This became known as his Court Packing Scheme. The President can appoint Justices, however, they must be approved by Congress. After a long period of embarrassing debate, the Senate rejected Roosevelts proposal. This, in turn, caused Roosevelt to reject the Senate. He set out on a mission to purge theDemocratic party of the moderate type thinker, replacing him with the ultra-liberal. Roosevelt used his diplomatic and military powers in the later part of his Administration nearly as much as he used his executive and legislative powers in the first half. At the time Roosevelt took office, the nation was suprisingly isolationistic. This started in the late nineteenth century, and continued up to the Roosevelt Administration. When the Great Depression hit in the 1930s, America became even more concernedwith its own problems. However, seeing the importance of a global view and seeing the possible impact of World War II, Roosevelt directed the country toward nations abroad.Roosevelt described his foreign policy as that of a good neighbor. The phrase came to be used to describe the US attitude toward the countries of Latin America. Under the policy, the United States took a stronger lead in promoting good will among these nations. The Platt Amendment of 1901 gave the US the right to intervene in the affairs of Cuba. In May of 1934, the government repealed this amendment. It also withdrew American occupation forces from some Caribbean republics, and settled long- standing oil disputes with Mexico. Roosevelt was the first to sign reciprocal trade agreements with the Latin American countries, including Brazil, Columbia, Costa Rica, Cuba, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti and Nicaragua. In 1935, the US signed treaties of non-aggression and conciliation with six Latin American nations. This desire to spread ties across the Western Hemispheres led to reciprocal trade agreements with Canada. Roosevelt also used personal diplomacy by taking trips to various Latin American nations. In July, 1934, he became the first American president to visit South American inhis trip to Columbia. In 1936, he attended the Inter-American Conference for the Maintenance of Peace, in Buenos Aires. Roosevelt used his diplomatic power of recognition to resume trading between the Soviet Union and the US The recognition was given to the Soviet government in November of 1933. This was the first attempt at civil relations since the Russian Revolution in 1917. In 1933, for the first time in 16 years, the two nations exchanged representatives. In 1937, Japan, at war with China, attacked a US river gunboat, the USS Panay, on the Yangtze River, killing two US citizens. This event infuriated the American public as well as the Roosevelt Administration. However, the US protested the Japaneseaction rather than demanding action taken against them. Roosevelt used his diplomatic power and refused to recognize the Japanese puppet state of Manchukuo in Northern Chinauntil there was an official apology. Shortly after Roosevelts statement, Japan made an officialapology to the US and offend to pay for the damages in full. Although Roosevelt set his sights upon a global society, many Americans disagreed. This school of thought led to the Neutrality Acts of the 1930s. These acts, passed by Congress, prohibited the US from furnishing weapons or supplies to anynation at war. President Roosevelt hoped that any more of these laws that would be enacted inthe future would allow more flexibility. He disliked the fact that these Acts treated all nations the same, whether a country had attacked another or not. World War II began on September 1, 1939, when Germany invaded Poland. Still,many Americans did not agree that the situation was as dangerou